Successful Public Sector Tenders and Grants
3 Times When You Shouldn’t Ask a Clarification Question
Public sector tenders often come with detailed specifications — but not always. Sometimes, content may feel vague or open to interpretation, prompting suppliers to consider submitting a clarification question.
But here’s the thing: not all ambiguity is bad.
In fact, there are moments when not asking a question can give you a strategic edge — helping you stand out and even score higher. Here are three such scenarios where silence can work in your favour.
1. When the Ambiguity Works to Your Advantage
If the tender wording leaves room for interpretation — and your existing offer fits neatly into that space — you may want to proceed without questioning it.
For example, if the specification says “contractor to propose an appropriate service model” rather than prescribing one, it’s likely the buyer wants to see your thinking. Clarifying it could lead to a rigid definition that removes your advantage or limits your ability to demonstrate your strengths.
Why this works: When you’re already delivering a similar service — or you have a streamlined, cost-effective model — leaning into the ambiguity allows you to present a solution that plays to your core strengths without restrictions.
Tip: If the ambiguity allows you to tailor the response to what you already do well, take it. A clarification might only narrow the field.
2. When You Can Provide Options Within Your Response
Occasionally, tenders are vague about deliverables, scope boundaries, or pricing structures. Rather than ask for clarity, use this as an opportunity to offer a base proposal and clearly defined optional enhancements.
For instance:
“Our core service includes X and Y. In addition, we offer Z as an optional extra, priced separately in Section 4.”
This approach shows flexibility, commercial awareness, and transparency — three things buyers value highly in SME suppliers.
Why this works: By giving the buyer choice, you demonstrate an understanding of both compliance and added value. It shows that you’re not just following instructions, but thinking strategically about how to deliver the best result.
3. When the Buyer Wants to See How You Think
Sometimes, ambiguity is intentional. If a question is open-ended or slightly broad, it may not be a drafting oversight — it could be a test of your thinking.
When buyers ask questions like “How would you approach a scenario where service requirements change mid-contract?” they’re not looking for a textbook answer. They want to see how you problem-solve, how you work with clients, and whether your approach aligns with their culture and values.
Why this works: Responding to open questions with a thoughtful, well-structured answer is a brilliant opportunity to showcase your professionalism, adaptability, and ethos. Asking for clarification here may signal hesitation or a lack of confidence.
Final Thoughts
Not every tender question needs clarification. In fact, sometimes holding back is the smarter move — especially when it gives you space to showcase your strengths, propose value-added options, or demonstrate the way you work.
If you’re ever unsure about how to respond to ambiguity in a bid, you don’t have to figure it out alone.
Talk Response Strategy with Tender Response
Sometimes, a quick strategic steer makes all the difference. Book a 1-hour strategy call with one of our tender specialists to talk through your next opportunity — including whether to clarify, how to position your response, and what buyers really want to see.
Just £125 + VAT — tailored advice, clear direction, no fluff.
Get in touch to book your session today.
This article was posted by:
